{"server":"io.github.klmlfl/case-doha-record","count":7,"tools":[{"name":"get_candor_outcomes","title":null,"description":"How cases with a candor allegation (falsification, omission, or lack of candor) were resolved in the decided record: the favorable rate with vs without such an allegation, when the judge found a deliberate falsification vs when the applicant rebutted it, and when the applicant corrected the record before being confronted. Counts and denominators throughout. Descriptive, never a prediction.","input_schema":{"type":"object","properties":{}},"output_schema":null,"annotations":{"readOnlyHint":true,"openWorldHint":false,"destructiveHint":false},"source":"probe","observed_at":"2026-10-19T17:39:38.792Z"},{"name":"get_case","title":null,"description":"Fetch one decided DOHA case in full: what was alleged, the judge's findings per allegation, per-guideline formal findings, outcome, judge, representation, and appeal history. Use case_id from search_cases.","input_schema":{"type":"object","required":["case_id"],"properties":{"case_id":{"type":"integer","description":"The numeric case id from search_cases"}}},"output_schema":null,"annotations":{"readOnlyHint":true,"openWorldHint":false,"destructiveHint":false},"source":"probe","observed_at":"2026-10-19T17:39:38.792Z"},{"name":"get_conduct_recency","title":null,"description":"How much time had passed between the most recent conduct and the decision, measured from dates stated in the decisions, for the incident-type concerns (drugs, alcohol, criminal conduct, sexual behavior, protected information, IT misuse). Reports median years before favorable vs unfavorable decisions, with counts. Descriptive association, never a prediction.","input_schema":{"type":"object","properties":{"guideline":{"type":"string","description":"Optional single concern letter to scope to: H drugs, G alcohol, J criminal, D sexual behavior, K protected information, M IT misuse"}}},"output_schema":null,"annotations":{"readOnlyHint":true,"openWorldHint":false,"destructiveHint":false},"source":"probe","observed_at":"2026-10-19T17:39:38.792Z"},{"name":"get_statistics","title":null,"description":"Grant/denial statistics over decided hearing-level DOHA cases, grouped by year or by guideline, always with sample sizes. Same population rules as the site's Insights page.","input_schema":{"type":"object","properties":{"by":{"enum":["year","guideline"],"type":"string","description":"Grouping (default year)"},"year_to":{"type":"integer"},"guideline":{"type":"string","description":"Optional single guideline letter A-M to scope to"},"year_from":{"type":"integer"}}},"output_schema":null,"annotations":{"readOnlyHint":true,"openWorldHint":false,"destructiveHint":false},"source":"probe","observed_at":"2026-10-19T17:39:38.792Z"},{"name":"get_timelines","title":null,"description":"Measured DOHA timelines: median days from Statement of Reasons to hearing and to decision, from dates stated in the decisions themselves. Optionally scoped to one decision year.","input_schema":{"type":"object","properties":{"year":{"type":"integer","description":"Optional decision year to scope to"}}},"output_schema":null,"annotations":{"readOnlyHint":true,"openWorldHint":false,"destructiveHint":false},"source":"probe","observed_at":"2026-10-19T17:39:38.792Z"},{"name":"search_cases","title":null,"description":"Search 30,000+ decided public DOHA security-clearance decisions (1996 to present). Full-text query plus filters. Returns matching cases with outcome, date, guidelines, and a citable URL each.","input_schema":{"type":"object","properties":{"level":{"enum":["hearing","appeal"],"type":"string","description":"Decision level"},"limit":{"type":"integer","description":"Max results, 1-25 (default 10)"},"query":{"type":"string","description":"Full-text search, e.g. \"gambling debts sports betting\""},"outcome":{"enum":["granted","denied"],"type":"string","description":"Final outcome filter"},"year_to":{"type":"integer","description":"Latest decision year"},"guideline":{"type":"string","description":"Single guideline letter A-M (e.g. F = financial, B = foreign influence)"},"year_from":{"type":"integer","description":"Earliest decision year, e.g. 2020"}}},"output_schema":null,"annotations":{"readOnlyHint":true,"openWorldHint":false,"destructiveHint":false},"source":"probe","observed_at":"2026-10-19T17:39:38.792Z"},{"name":"similar_cases","title":null,"description":"The most similar decided cases to a given case, ranked by how alike the ALLEGATIONS read (never by outcome). Same list shown on the case page.","input_schema":{"type":"object","required":["case_id"],"properties":{"limit":{"type":"integer","description":"Max results, 1-10 (default 5)"},"case_id":{"type":"integer","description":"The numeric case id"}}},"output_schema":null,"annotations":{"readOnlyHint":true,"openWorldHint":false,"destructiveHint":false},"source":"probe","observed_at":"2026-10-19T17:39:38.792Z"}],"next_cursor":null,"next_actions":[{"action":"get_connection","description":"Connection block to call these tools","href":"/v1/servers/io.github.klmlfl%2Fcase-doha-record/connection?target=mcpServers","arguments":{"name":"io.github.klmlfl/case-doha-record","target":"mcpServers"}},{"action":"get_server","description":"Full descriptor with trust and connectability","href":"/v1/servers/io.github.klmlfl%2Fcase-doha-record","arguments":{"name":"io.github.klmlfl/case-doha-record"}}]}